In 2018/29 reporting processes for the University's departments transitioned to a new portal and system. Developments are in progress to enable Partner Institutions to use these systems. Until these are complete, Partner Institutions should continue to submit their reports using the proforma templates. The most recent report templates can be downloaded below and once completed, email to email@example.com. We would expect to receive your report within 4 weeks of attending the final examination board forms and once this has been processed, your fee and expenses will be paid.
Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Report (word doc)
Postgraduate interim report (word doc)
External Examiners who appear to be late in submitting a report will be contacted by the Quality and Academic Development team initially as a prompt. All undergraduate reports relating to June or July Boards of Examiners meetings should be submitted by 31st August 2019 at the latest and postgraduate reports relating to November or December Boards of Examiners meetings by 31st December 2019 at the latest.
If a report has not been received by the deadlines, and the Quality and Academic Team are unsuccessful in further requests for the reports, the Pro-Vice Chancellor (Education) will write to the examiner concerned with a further reminder. If this is unsuccessful, consideration will be given to terminating the examiner’s appointment on the grounds that the specified duties have not been fulfilled. Reports must be submitted within three months of the examination board to be considered 'received', since reports received after this point can no longer contribute meaningfully to other quality assurance mechanisms.
On receipt, reports are sent to the Head of Department (in the case of joint awards, the report will be sent to the Heads of all relevant departments), the Departmental Administrator, the appropriate Executive Dean(s) or nominee(s) and the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Education).
The Head of Department/School should discuss the reports at a team level and make a considered and timely response to each external examiner. The response should outline any action to be taken (or the reason why there will be no action if this is the case) in response to external examiners’ recommendations, copying this to the Executive Dean or nominee and QUAD. The Head of Department then reports back to the University in the relevant annual review of courses report.
The Executive Dean or nominee does not routinely consult with the Head of Department on departmental level issues, unless they are of particular concern and require urgent action. The Executive Dean or nominee considers external examiner reports to identify issues which cross departments and/or which merit consideration at the level of the faculty or at University level via the appropriate committee.
Undergraduate External Examiner issues for faculty consideration are normally referred by the Executive Dean or nominee to the Autumn term meeting of the Faculty Education Committee. Taught postgraduate external examiner issues are normally referred by the Executive Dean or nominee to the Spring term meeting of the Faculty Education Committee. The consideration of issues in this way enables departments to reflect upon relevant Faculty Education Committee discussions of external examiner issues when finalising their annual review of courses reports.
Copies of correspondence between Heads of Departments and Executive Dean or nominee or external examiners, including extracts of relevant Board minutes, will be collated by QUAD to be held on file.
Students should have access to External Examiner reports, via their representatives on Faculty Education Committee and on Departmental Student Voice Groups (formerly Student Staff Liaison Committees), or equivalent.
External Examiners for University of Essex Departments should use the online External Examiner Report Portal to submit their reports.
Page last updated: 12 August 2019