(BA) Bachelor of Arts
Philosophy and History (Including Year Abroad)
Current
University of Essex
University of Essex
Philosophical, Historical and Interdisciplinary Studies (School of)
Colchester Campus
Honours Degree
Full-time
Philosophy
History
BA VV5C
11/04/2013
Details
Professional accreditation
None
Admission criteria
A-levels: ABB-BBB
IB: 32-30 points
Entry requirements for students studying BTEC qualifications are dependent on units studied. Advice can be provided on an individual basis. The standard required is generally at Distinction level.
IELTS (International English Language Testing System) code
English language requirements for applicants whose first language is not English: IELTS 6.0 overall. (Different requirements apply for second year entry.)
If you are an international student requiring a Tier 4 visa to study in the UK please see our immigration webpages for the latest Home Office guidance on English language qualifications.
Other English language qualifications may be acceptable so please contact us for further details. If we accept the English component of an international qualification then it will be included in the information given about the academic levels required. Please note that date restrictions may apply to some English language qualifications.
Course qualifiers
A course qualifier is a bracketed addition to your course title to denote a specialisation or pathway that you have achieved via the completion of specific modules during your course. The
specific module requirements for each qualifier title are noted below. Eligibility for any selected qualifier will be determined by the department and confirmed by the final year Board of
Examiners. If the required modules are not successfully completed, your course title will remain as described above without any bracketed addition. Selection of a course qualifier is
optional and student can register preferences or opt-out via Online Module Enrolment (eNROL).
None
Rules of assessment
Rules of assessment are the rules, principles and frameworks which the University uses to calculate your course progression and final results.
Additional notes
None
External examiners
External Examiners provide an independent overview of our courses, offering their expertise and help towards our continual improvement of course content, teaching, learning, and assessment.
External Examiners are normally academics from other higher education institutions, but may be from the industry, business or the profession as appropriate for the course.
They comment on how well courses align with national standards, and on how well the teaching, learning and assessment methods allow students to develop and demonstrate the relevant knowledge and skills needed to achieve their awards.
External Examiners who are responsible for awards are key members of Boards of Examiners. These boards make decisions about student progression within their course and about whether students can receive their final award.
Programme aims
To provide a wide-ranging and sound academic grounding in the disciplines of philosophy and history.
To encourage students to identify the relevance of philosophy to other forms of enquiry (e.g. social, political, cultural, historical), its interconnections with other disciplines, in particular history, and its applicability to issues in public and political life.
To equip students with a range of subject-specific skills fostered by the study of philosophy and history, preparing them for subsequent research or further study.
To develop students' general intellectual capacities for independent thought and critical reflection with a view to enhancing their future professional and personal trajectories.
To provide students with opportunities to experience a different system of HE through a broad range of courses on the Year Abroad.
To develop students' intercultural skills necessary for living and studying in a different culture.
The outcomes listed below represent the minimum that might be expected of a graduate of the Departments of Philosophy and History of the University of Essex.
It is the intention of the Departments that the vast majority of graduates will achieve significantly more.
Details of the different standards expected for the various classes of degree can be found in the Student Handbook produced annually by the Departments.
Learning outcomes and learning, teaching and assessment methods
On successful completion of the programme a graduate should demonstrate knowledge and skills as follows:
A: Knowledge and understanding
A1: Knowledge and understanding of philosophical texts from a variety of traditions (analytic and continental) and/or of a range of historical and social developments in European and extra-European' history in the early modern and/or modern eras.
A2: Knowledge and understanding of significant figures, themes, problems and philosophical systems in the history of philosophy and/or of thematic historical topics
A3: Knowledge and understanding of major issues currently being debated by philosophers and those at the interface between philosophy and history.
A4: Command of techniques of philosophical reasoning and of philosophical method, embracing diverse approaches and/or of key concepts and fundamental principles of historical analysis, such as concepts of continuity, change and comparative analysis.
A5: Knowledge and understanding of sources and methods available for historical research.
Learning methods
Outcomes A1-A5 are acquired through:
Teaching in lecture and class format
Lecturers conveying module content in a general manner while allowing for, and encouraging, questions from students
Classes generally focusing on specific textual, argumentative or practical examples, where emphasis is placed on student discussion
The use of books and journal articles to convey module content; the independent use of all library resources (databases, books, articles) in writing coursework and preparing for examinations.
Assessment methods
Outcomes A1-A5 are assessed through continuous coursework and unseen written examinations.
Coursework consists of essays, and in the case of History of document analysis and a self-reflexive journal (which includes a review), written during the academic year for a specified module, returned with a grade and written feedback to the student.
Examinations consist of essay-based questions, for which revision classes are provided.
Coursework tests the ability to research a topic using, for example, library and internet resources, expound specified texts and enter into detailed argumentation with them.
Unseen exams test the ability to rehearse and assess arguments in relation to specific questions posed within a limited time frame.
B: Intellectual and cognitive skills
B1: Capacity to follow complex arguments, and to present one's own evaluation of them.
B2: Capacity to summarise complex and demanding texts, and to assess critically the strengths and weaknesses of the views they propose.
B3: Ability to gather and assimilate large amounts of information and data (both primary and secondary), and analyse such material for deployment in reasoned argument, with use of historical evidence and philosophical tools appropriate to the discipline.
B4: Capacity to identify underlying issues in various kinds of debate, philosophical or historical, and to highlight deficiencies such as unquestioned assumptions, superficial analogies and unsubstantiated claims.
B5: Capacities for abstract discursive reasoning and, where relevant, for historical explanation and interpretation.
B6: Capacity to reconstruct the mentalities of past societies and/or to engage in history of ideas.
Learning methods
Skills B1-B6 are obtained and developed through the teaching and learning methods described above.
Students are expected to read background material for lectures and classes, and to participate fully in class discussions.
Assessment methods
Outcomes B1-B6 are assessed through continuous coursework and unseen written examinations.
Coursework consists of essays, and in the case of History document analysis and a self-reflexive journal (which includes a review), written during the academic year for a specified module, returned with a grade and written feedback for the student.
Examinations consist of essay-based questions, for which revision classes are provided.
C: Practical skills
C1: Ability to write an analysis assimilating complex arguments and significant amounts of data, expressing oneself clearly and with argumentative cogency.
C2: Ability to abstract and synthesize relevant information from a range of primary and secondary sources, using printed, internet and - if required - archival sources.
C3: Ability to use accepted conventions for presentation of footnotes, references and bibliographies in written work.
C4: Ability to use a range of methods (library and internet resources) to perform bibliographical searches.
C5: Ability to apply the necessary organisational and cultural skills for living and working abroad.
Learning methods
Skills C1-C4 are acquired and developed primarily by the preparation for and writing of coursework, in conjunction with feedback on essays, guidance given in teaching, and discussion with the lecturer during class and office hours.
Skill C5 is acquired through the guided but relatively independent process of organising and successfully completing a period of living and studying abroad.
Assessment methods
Outcomes C1-C4 are assessed through continuous coursework and unseen written examinations.
Coursework consists of essays, and in the case of History document analysis and a self-reflexive journal (which includes a review), written during the academic year for a specified module, returned with a grade and written feedback for the student.
Examinations consist of essay-based questions, for which revision classes are provided.
D: Key skills
D1: Ability to produce fluent and effective communication, both oral and written.
D2: Use of relevant information technology to research and present written work.
D4: Ability to identify precisely the problem to be solved, to articulate critically the underlying assumptions relevant to the problem, to analyse presuppositions and operative concepts, to analyse data and distinguish relevant from irrelevant detail, to compare and critically assess different and possibly contradictory solutions to a problem and identify their respective costs, to provide argument and evidence in defence of one's preferred solution or interpretation.
D6: Ability to organize one's reading, thinking and writing in relation to specific topics, to work independently, to work to a deadline, to learn from written feedback on coursework and oral communication from teachers.
Learning methods
Skills D1,2,4 & 6 are acquired and developed through the teaching and learning methods described above, including class/seminar discussions.
Students are encouraged to use the University key skills on-line package.
They are expected to make routine use of word processing packages, library searches, internet philosophy and history resources, and email, as part of effective course participation.
The use of word-processing, electronic library catalogues and other relevant electronic bibliographic resources, and the use and interpretation of relevant material via the internet is introduced in the first year.
Students build on these skills in subsequent years.
Where relevant, students are encouraged to use, present or evaluate information provided in numerical or statistical form.
Assessment methods
Outcomes D1,2,4 & 6 are assessed through continuous coursework, including class/seminar performance, and unseen written examinations.
Coursework consists of essays, and in the case of History, document analysis and a self-reflexive journal (which includes a review), written during the academic year for a specified module, returned with a grade and written feedback for the student.
Examinations consist of essay-based questions, for which revision classes are provided.
The coursework journal for HR211 requires students to reflect on their progress.
For those students who elect to write a dissertation (HR831), the outcomes are reinforced through the process of researching and writing a substantial independent study.