TH243-5-SP-CO:
Tragedy

The details
2019/20
Literature, Film, and Theatre Studies
Colchester Campus
Spring
Undergraduate: Level 5
Current
Monday 13 January 2020
Friday 20 March 2020
15
27 March 2019

 

Requisites for this module
TH141
(none)
(none)
(none)

 

(none)

Key module for

(none)

Module description

‘We are looking for the structure of tragedy in our own culture’ Modern Tragedy Raymond Williams

This module examines the idea of tragedy in the theatre, tracing its development from classical Greek Tragedy to the present day. The module concentrates upon the structure of tragedy, focusing on four key ideas connected to plot, the peripiteia, the anagnorises, hubris and hamartia. The module also investigates ways in which the genre has developed up to the present day.

The chosen texts question some of the basic concepts around Aristotle’s ideas and investigate how these ideas have been challenged, modified and rejected. We look at private and domestic tragedies as well as political ones.

Module aims

The aims of this module are:

1. To equip students with the appropriate analytical skills to enable them to understand three aspects of the tragic form.

2. To examine in detail nine tragedies that range from Ancient Greek tragedies to contemporary tragedies.

3. To equip students with an understanding of Aristotle’s ideas about the ‘peripiteia’ and the ‘anagnorises’.

4. To equip students with an understanding of Aristotle’s ideas about ‘Hubris’ and ‘Hamartia’

Module learning outcomes

At the end of the module, students will:

1. Have developed a critical understanding of Aristotle’s ideas about the way a tragic plot can be constructed

2. Be able to understand and use the terms: anagnorises, peripiteia, hubris and hamartia appropriately

3. Be able to identify and critically evaluate three plays that do not conform to Aristotle’s ideas

4. Have developed a critical understanding and analysed the nine tragedies on the reading list.

Module information

No additional information available.

Learning and teaching methods

Weekly two-hour seminars, combining practical and theoretical elements

Bibliography

  • Taylor, Don; Varakis, Angie; Sophocles. (2006) Antigone, London: Methuen Drama. vol. Methuen student editions
  • Eldridge, David; Vinterberg, Thomas; Hausen, Bo; Rukov Mogens. (2004) Thomas Vinterberg, Mogens Rukov and Bo hr. Hansen's Festen, London: Methuen.
  • Lavery, Bryony. (2002) Frozen, London: Faber and Faber.
  • Walton, J. Michael; McDonald, Marianne; Euripides. (2002) Medea, London: Methuen.
  • McLeish, Kenneth; Aristotle. (1999) Poetics, London: Nick Hern Books. vol. Dramatic contexts
  • Miller, Arthur. (2000) Death of a salesman: certain private conversations in two acts and a requiem, London: Penguin. vol. Penguin classics

The above list is indicative of the essential reading for the course. The library makes provision for all reading list items, with digital provision where possible, and these resources are shared between students. Further reading can be obtained from this module's reading list.

Assessment items, weightings and deadlines

Coursework / exam Description Deadline Weighting
Coursework Essay (2,500 words) 20/04/2020 95%
Practical Participation 5%
Practical Presentation (class based formative, (no written assignment) to take place in week 22 0%

Overall assessment

Coursework Exam
100% 0%

Reassessment

Coursework Exam
100% 0%
Module supervisor and teaching staff
Professor Jonathan Lichtenstein
LiFTS General Office – email: liftstt@essex.ac.uk Telephone 01206 872626

 

Availability
Yes
No
No

External examiner

Dr Anthony Fisher
Reader in Theatre and Philosophy
Resources
Available via Moodle
Of 20 hours, 20 (100%) hours available to students:
0 hours not recorded due to service coverage or fault;
0 hours not recorded due to opt-out by lecturer(s).

 

Further information

Disclaimer: The University makes every effort to ensure that this information on its Module Directory is accurate and up-to-date. Exceptionally it can be necessary to make changes, for example to programmes, modules, facilities or fees. Examples of such reasons might include a change of law or regulatory requirements, industrial action, lack of demand, departure of key personnel, change in government policy, or withdrawal/reduction of funding. Changes to modules may for example consist of variations to the content and method of delivery or assessment of modules and other services, to discontinue modules and other services and to merge or combine modules. The University will endeavour to keep such changes to a minimum, and will also keep students informed appropriately by updating our programme specifications and module directory.

The full Procedures, Rules and Regulations of the University governing how it operates are set out in the Charter, Statutes and Ordinances and in the University Regulations, Policy and Procedures.