The details
Colchester Campus
Undergraduate: Level 6
Thursday 03 October 2019
Saturday 14 December 2019
04 October 2018


Requisites for this module



Key module for

BA VV15 Philosophy and History,
BA VV16 Philosophy and History (Including Placement Year),
BA VV51 Philosophy and History (Including Foundation Year),
BA VV5C Philosophy and History (Including Year Abroad),
BA VV5X Philosophy and History (Including Foundation Year and Year Abroad)

Module description

By the beginning of the 19th century, it had become clear to many European thinkers that modernity was in a state of crisis. The 'age of Enlightenment' had long undermined confidence in traditional forms of community, authority and value. But it was still far from clear what should be put in their place. Philosophers, theologians and poets saw themselves as faced with nothing less than a threat of cultural and existential collapse.

In this module, we will examine rival responses to this 19th century crisis of culture via the writings of Søren Kierkegaard. We'll begin with his portrayal of aesthetic life and consider the critical light this throws on Romantic responses to the modern experience of alienation. Secondly, we'll examine Kierkegaard's famous attack on Hegel and on Rationalistic accounts of what it would mean for we moderns to feel at home in the world. We'll then turn to Kierkegaard's own diagnosis of the crisis of modernity in terms of a loss of subjectivity through the process of 'levelling'. Finally, we'll critically examine his positive suggestions about what a non-alienated form of modern subjectivity would look like, focusing on his conception of self-constancy.

Module aims

The aims of the module are:

1. to develop students’ familiarity with some of the major themes of 19th century European philosophy;
2. with the help of secondary sources, to undertake a close reading of selected texts from this period, focussing on Kierkegaard’s writings;
3. to foster an understanding of conceptions of modernity in terms of cultural and existential crisis and some major lines of response to the crisis;
4. to advance an understanding of key philosophical concepts, including subjectivity, alienation and self-constancy
5. to develop the ability to produce argumentatively precise and robust critical analysis of philosophical texts and ideas.

Module learning outcomes

By the end of the module, students should be able to:

1. identify major problems, themes and positions developed within 19th Century debates about the crisis of modernity;
2. critically appraise three main lines of response to this sense of crisis;
3. produce a detailed essay plan and extended essay (4,000 words) which provides both synopsis and critical assessment of positions and arguments in 19th century European philosophy;
4. explain selected central concepts in the writings of key figures including Fichte, Hegel and Kierkegaard;
5. present a selected text and field questions from peers.

Module information

Erasmus/IP students must have already taken an introductory module in Philosophy at their home institution.

Learning and teaching methods

3 hours per week to cover lecture, seminar and student presentations. Week 8 is a Reading Week.


This module does not appear to have a published bibliography.

Assessment items, weightings and deadlines

Coursework / exam Description Deadline Weighting
Coursework Weekly Quizzes OVERALL MARK 25%
Coursework Essay Plan 25/11/2019 15%
Coursework Autumn Term Essay (3500 Words) 20/12/2019 60%

Overall assessment

Coursework Exam
100% 0%


Coursework Exam
100% 0%
Module supervisor and teaching staff
Dr Daniel Watts



External examiner

Dr Thomas Joseph Stern
University College London
Senior Lecturer
Available via Moodle
Of 24 hours, 24 (100%) hours available to students:
0 hours not recorded due to service coverage or fault;
0 hours not recorded due to opt-out by lecturer(s).


Further information

Disclaimer: The University makes every effort to ensure that this information on its Module Directory is accurate and up-to-date. Exceptionally it can be necessary to make changes, for example to programmes, modules, facilities or fees. Examples of such reasons might include a change of law or regulatory requirements, industrial action, lack of demand, departure of key personnel, change in government policy, or withdrawal/reduction of funding. Changes to modules may for example consist of variations to the content and method of delivery or assessment of modules and other services, to discontinue modules and other services and to merge or combine modules. The University will endeavour to keep such changes to a minimum, and will also keep students informed appropriately by updating our programme specifications and module directory.

The full Procedures, Rules and Regulations of the University governing how it operates are set out in the Charter, Statutes and Ordinances and in the University Regulations, Policy and Procedures.