GV383-6-AU-CO:
German Politics I

The details
2024/25
Government
Colchester Campus
Autumn
Undergraduate: Level 6
Current
Thursday 03 October 2024
Friday 13 December 2024
15
26 April 2024

 

Requisites for this module
(none)
(none)
(none)
(none)

 

(none)

Key module for

(none)

Module description

The aim of this module is to provide a profound understanding of contemporary German politics. For this purpose, the course will give a brief overview over Germany’s post-war political development. We will examine, in particular, the role of political culture and political institutions as determinants of successful democratisation. The challenge of bridging the East-West divide after reunification will receive special focus.


The course sheds light on general trends and developments that Germany shares with other countries, such as the increasing fluidity of electoral preferences or the fragmentation of the party system. At the same time, the course outlines and discusses some of the more distinct features of the German case, such as its ‘militant democracy’, mixed-member proportional electoral system, and the role of the second chamber and the Constitutional Court as veto-players. Contextualising and discussing current events in German politics will also be an integral part of this module.

Module aims

The aim of this module is:



  • To provide students with a thorough knowledge and understanding of German politics.

Module learning outcomes

By the end of this module, students will be expected to be able to:



  1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of Germany’s polity;

  2. Understand Germany’s political culture and institutions;

  3. Assess the German case in comparison with other country cases;

  4. Analyse challenges the country is facing.

Module information

No additional information available.

Learning and teaching methods

The module will be delivered via:

  • 1x2 hour seminar each week

Bibliography*

  • Alister Miskimmon. (2012) 'Germany and the Wider World: A New Role in the Twenty-First Century?', in The politics of the new Germany, Abingdon: Routledge., pp.196-216
  • Russell J. Dalton. (©1993) 'Changing Political Cultures', in Politics in Germany, New York: HarperCollins College Publishers. vol. The HarperCollins series in comparative politics, pp.107-144
  • Simon Green. (2014) 'Citizenship, Migration and Cultural Pluralism', in Developments in German politics 4, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan., pp.262-278
  • Wilke, Jurgen. (2008) 'Germany: Media System', in The international encyclopedia of communication, United States: Wiley/Blackwell., pp.1961-1964
  • Henry Krisch. (2009) 'Germany Divided and Unified', in Politics in Germany, Washington, DC: CQ Press., pp.38-56
  • Alister Miskimmon. (2012) 'A blockaded system of government?', in The politics of the new Germany, Abingdon: Routledge., pp.72-94
  • Stephen Padgett. (2014) 'Energy and Climate Protection Policy', in Developments in German politics 4, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan., pp.241-261
  • Susan E. Scarrow. (1997) 'Party Competition and Institutional Change: The Expansion of Direct Democracy in Germany', in Party Politics. vol. 3 (4) , pp.451-472
  • Max Kaase. (2000) 'Germany: A Society and a Media System in Transition', in Democracy and the media: a comparative perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., pp.375-401
  • Russell J. Dalton. (© 2020) 'Elections and Political Parties', in Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies, Los Angeles, California: SAGE, CQ Press., pp.133-154
  • Georg Vanberg. (2005) 'The Federal Constitutional Court in Comparative Perspective', in The politics of constitutional review in Germany, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., pp.61-94
  • Simon Green; Dan Hough; Alister Miskimmon. (2012) The politics of the new Germany, Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Christian Stecker; Klaus H. Goetz. (2014) 'Government at the Centre', in Developments in German politics 4, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan., pp.16-34
  • Russell J. Dalton. (© 2020) 'Citizens and the Democratic Process', in Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies, Los Angeles, California: SAGE, CQ Press., pp.255-277
  • Margret Hornsteiner; Thomas Saalfeld. (2014) 'Parties and Party System', in Developments in German politics 4, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan., pp.78-102
  • Reimut Zohlnhöfer. (2014) 'Economic Policy', in Developments in German politics 4, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan., pp.149-165
  • Debus, Marc; Müller, Jochen. (2013) 'Do Voters' Coalition Preferences Affect Government Formation?', in West European Politics. vol. 36 (5) , pp.1007-1028
  • Schmidt, Manfred G. (2003) 'Continuity and Discontinuity in the Federal Republic of Germany', in Political institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press., pp.201-235
  • Alister Miskimmon. (2012) 'Parties and voters: The Path to Fluid Party Politics?', in The politics of the new Germany, Abingdon: Routledge., pp.94-114
  • Schmidt, Manfred G. (2003) '“Governing with Judges”: The Judiciary, the Court System, and Judicial Review', in Political institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press., pp.106-130
  • Alister Miskimmon. (2012) 'Citizenship and demographics: (Still) a country of immigration?', in The politics of the new Germany, Abingdon: Routledge., pp.115-135
  • Schmidt, Manfred G. (2003) 'Governing a Semi-Sovereign State: Germany's Executive and its Institutional Context', in Political institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press., pp.26-73
  • Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger; Partheymüller, Julia. (2012) 'Why Voters Decide Late: A Simultaneous Test of Old and New Hypotheses at the 2005 and 2009 German Federal Elections', in German Politics. vol. 21 (3) , pp.299-316
  • D. Hawkins. (2009) 'Case Studies', in The SAGE handbook of comparative politics, Los Angeles: SAGE., pp.50-65
  • Russell J. Dalton. (2014) 'Partisan Dealignment and Voting Choice', in Developments in German politics 4, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan., pp.57-77
  • Schmidt, Manfred G. (2003) 'From Negative Parliamentary Politics to Democratic Parliamentary Government: The Role of the Legislature', in Political institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press., pp.74-105
  • Dieter Rucht. (2014) 'The Politics of Social Protest', in Developments in German politics 4, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan., pp.118-132
  • Russell J. Dalton. (©1993) 'The Institutions of Governance', in Politics in Germany, New York: HarperCollins College Publishers. vol. The HarperCollins series in comparative politics, pp.44-79
  • Miranda A. Schreurs. (2016) 'Is Germany Really an Environmental Leader?', in Current History. vol. 115 (779) , pp.114-116
  • Alister Miskimmon. (2012) 'Conclusion: Three themes reassessed', in The politics of the new Germany, Abingdon: Routledge., pp.217-223
  • Klüver, Heike. (2015) 'Interest Groups in the German Bundestag: Exploring the Issue Linkage between Citizens and Interest Groups', in German Politics. vol. 24 (2) , pp.137-153
  • Schmidt, Manfred G. (2003) 'Against “Leviathan” and “Behemoth”: The Anti-Totalitarian Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany', in Political institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press., pp.9-25
  • Krisch, Henry. (c2009) 'Organized Interest Groups and Social Movements', in Politics in Germany, Washington, DC: CQ Press., pp.136-156
  • Green, Simon; Hough, Dan; Miskimmon, Alister. (2012) Politics of the new Germany, London: Routledge.
  • Roberts, Geoffrey K. (2016) 'Germany and Europe', in German politics today, Manchester: Manchester University Press., pp.189-205

The above list is indicative of the essential reading for the course. The library makes provision for all reading list items, with digital provision where possible, and these resources are shared between students. Further reading can be obtained from this module's reading list.

Assessment items, weightings and deadlines

Coursework / exam Description Deadline Coursework weighting
Coursework   Essay    60% 
Coursework   Online Test    40% 

Exam format definitions

  • Remote, open book: Your exam will take place remotely via an online learning platform. You may refer to any physical or electronic materials during the exam.
  • In-person, open book: Your exam will take place on campus under invigilation. You may refer to any physical materials such as paper study notes or a textbook during the exam. Electronic devices may not be used in the exam.
  • In-person, open book (restricted): The exam will take place on campus under invigilation. You may refer only to specific physical materials such as a named textbook during the exam. Permitted materials will be specified by your department. Electronic devices may not be used in the exam.
  • In-person, closed book: The exam will take place on campus under invigilation. You may not refer to any physical materials or electronic devices during the exam. There may be times when a paper dictionary, for example, may be permitted in an otherwise closed book exam. Any exceptions will be specified by your department.

Your department will provide further guidance before your exams.

Overall assessment

Coursework Exam
100% 0%

Reassessment

Coursework Exam
100% 0%
Module supervisor and teaching staff
Dr Daniele Saracino, email: daniele.saracino@essex.ac.uk.
Dr Daniele Saracino
Please contact govquery@essex.ac.uk

 

Availability
Yes
Yes
No

External examiner

Dr Edward Morgan-Jones
University of Kent
Reader in Comparative Politics
Resources
Available via Moodle
Of 20 hours, 20 (100%) hours available to students:
0 hours not recorded due to service coverage or fault;
0 hours not recorded due to opt-out by lecturer(s).

 

Further information
Government

* Please note: due to differing publication schedules, items marked with an asterisk (*) base their information upon the previous academic year.

Disclaimer: The University makes every effort to ensure that this information on its Module Directory is accurate and up-to-date. Exceptionally it can be necessary to make changes, for example to programmes, modules, facilities or fees. Examples of such reasons might include a change of law or regulatory requirements, industrial action, lack of demand, departure of key personnel, change in government policy, or withdrawal/reduction of funding. Changes to modules may for example consist of variations to the content and method of delivery or assessment of modules and other services, to discontinue modules and other services and to merge or combine modules. The University will endeavour to keep such changes to a minimum, and will also keep students informed appropriately by updating our programme specifications and module directory.

The full Procedures, Rules and Regulations of the University governing how it operates are set out in the Charter, Statutes and Ordinances and in the University Regulations, Policy and Procedures.