This module will introduce students to debates that lay the foundation for modern philosophy. Starting with a close reading of Descartes' Meditations, we explore responses from key thinkers in the rationalist and empiricist traditions.
In the wake of Descartes's philosophy, the 'new philosophy' sets out to provide a foundation of the human project by stressing the power of human intellect unaided by divine revelation. The "Continental Rationalists", Spinoza and Leibniz, share Descartes conviction that the human mind could acquire substantive knowledge of the world on the basis of reason alone. Despite this shared conviction, however, there are profound differences between these individual philosophers. The "British Empiricists" thinkers, Locke and Hume, start from the shared conviction that knowledge of the world cannot be attained without recourse to sense experience. In the case of Locke, this leads to a more modest account of the scope of human knowledge; with Hume it leads to scepticism that throws the quest for knowledge into radical doubt.
We will more particularly focus on the following questions. What is the nature and limit of human knowledge? What role does human subjectivity have to play in the foundation of knowledge about the external world? What role, if any, does God play in knowledge? Does our common-sense view of the world have a philosophical foundation? Does sensory experience provide the only path to knowledge of the world, or can we gain knowledge through the exercise of pure reason? What is the relation between the body and the mind?