Research Design and Critical Appraisal
Health and Social Care (School of)
Postgraduate: Level 7
Wednesday 15 January 2020
Wednesday 18 March 2020
04 March 2019
Requisites for this module
This module provides the student with an advanced understanding of the research study designs commonly used in health research. It combines a theoretical with a practical approach to enable students to search for, obtain, and understand the research literature and the critical skills to analyse and synthesis the material into a literature review. The module covers the following themes:
* Principles of research and research methods.
* Critical appraisal and reviewing research literature
* Credibility, responsibility and ethics
By the end of the module, students should:
* Have an advanced understanding of the range of research methods that are in common use in their discipline.
* Be able to conduct and report a rigorous and advanced search for research literature.
* Critically appraise research papers and construct a literature review.
* Apply research findings, including literature reviews, within their working practice.
This module aims to develop rigorous critical appraisal skills to support evidence based practice in health and social care. It aims to develop a rich understanding of research methods in order to appraise published materials to apply evidence in practice settings, and to support the skills necessary to produce a literature review that appraises, synthesises and interprets the implications of a body of evidence.
On successful completion of this module, the [learner] will be able to:
Develop an appropriate research question relevant to health and social care pratice
Have an advanced understanding of the range of research methods that are in common use in their discipline
Be able to conduct and report a rigorous and advanced search for research literature
Critically appraise research papers and construct a literature review
Apply research findings, including literature reviews, within their working practice
Evidence based practice and leadership is an essential component of responsive and responsible health and social care policy, strategy, leadership, service provision and coordination of action for health. To scrutinise the knowledge that informs and guides practice, the practitioner needs to be research-literate and a critical consumer of research evidence. This module develops rigorous critical appraisal skills for evidence based practice, and in particular supports the process of acquiring, appraising and making inferences from published evidence.
The module uses lectures and computer lab sessions supported by self-study formative tasks that develop the student's own literature review project. Group tutorial and supported study time runs after most lectures to facilitate the formative tasks. Further resources and guidance are available through Moodle.
- Greenhalgh, Trisha. (2019) How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine and healthcare, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Dew, Kevin. (2007) 'A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies', in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. vol. 31 (5) , pp.433-437
- World Health Organisation and Regional Office for the Western Pacific. (2001) Health research methodology: a guide for training in research methods, Manila, Philippines: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific.
- PRISMA, http://prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/
- O'Brien, G. M.; Donaghue, N.; Walker, I.; Wood, C. A. (2014-12-01) 'Deservingness and Gratitude in the Context of Heart Transplantation', in Qualitative Health Research. vol. 24 (12) , pp.1635-1647
- Aveyard, Helen. (2019) Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide, London: Open University Press.
- T. Greenhalgh; J. Howick; N. Maskrey. (2014) 'Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?', in BMJ. vol. 348
- Booth, A. (2006) '“Brimful of STARLITE”: toward standards for reporting literature searches', in Journal of the Medical Library Association. vol. 94 (4) , pp.421-
- Seale, Clive; Silverman, D. (1997) 'Ensuring rigour in qualitative research', in The European Journal of Public Health: The Oxford University Press. vol. 7 (4) , pp.379-384
- NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2012) Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance.
- Burls, A. (no date) What is critical appraisal?.
- Wildridge, Valerie; Bell, Lucy. (2002) 'How CLIP became ECLIPSE: a mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/management information', in Health Information and Libraries Journal. vol. 19 (2) , pp.113-115
- Aveyard, Helen; Sharp, Pam; Woolliams, Mary. (2015) A beginner's guide to critical thinking and writing in health and social care, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
- Philip Lindner et al. (2014) 'The impact of telephone versus e-mail therapist guidance on treatment outcomes, therapeutic alliance and treatment engagement in Internet-delivered CBT for depression: A randomised pilot trial', in Internet Interventions. vol. 1 (4) , pp.182-187
- Davies, Huw; Crombie, Ian. (no date) What are confidence intervals and p-values?.
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, http://handbook.cochrane.org/
The above list is indicative of the essential reading for the course. The library makes provision for all reading list items, with digital provision where possible, and these resources are shared between students. Further reading can be obtained from this module's reading list.
Assessment items, weightings and deadlines
|Coursework / exam
||3000 word literature review resubmission
||3,000 word literature review
Module supervisor and teaching staff
Dr Caroline Barratt, email: email@example.com.
Dr Caroline Barratt
Senior Student Administrator
Dr Nicola Clarke
Birmingham City University
Senior Lecturer/Professional Navigator/Academic Advisor/Seda Accredited Doctoral
Available via Moodle
Of 22 hours, 16 (72.7%) hours available to students:
6 hours not recorded due to service coverage or fault;
0 hours not recorded due to opt-out by lecturer(s).
Disclaimer: The University makes every effort to ensure that this information on its Module Directory is accurate and up-to-date. Exceptionally it can
be necessary to make changes, for example to programmes, modules, facilities or fees. Examples of such reasons might include a change of law or regulatory requirements,
industrial action, lack of demand, departure of key personnel, change in government policy, or withdrawal/reduction of funding. Changes to modules may for example consist
of variations to the content and method of delivery or assessment of modules and other services, to discontinue modules and other services and to merge or combine modules.
The University will endeavour to keep such changes to a minimum, and will also keep students informed appropriately by updating our programme specifications and module directory.
The full Procedures, Rules and Regulations of the University governing how it operates are set out in the Charter, Statutes and Ordinances and in the University Regulations, Policy and Procedures.