GV955-7-SP-CO:
Governance and Policy of European Economies

The details
2025/26
Government
Colchester Campus
Spring
Postgraduate: Level 7
Current
Monday 12 January 2026
Friday 20 March 2026
15
11 March 2025

 

Requisites for this module
(none)
(none)
(none)
(none)

 

(none)

Key module for

MA L24012 Global and Comparative Politics,
MA L240EB Global and Comparative Politics,
MA L240EK Global and Comparative Politics,
MSC L24012 Global and Comparative Politics,
MSC L240EB Global and Comparative Politics,
MSC L240EK Global and Comparative Politics

Module description

This module explores the dynamic interaction between political and economic processes in Europe, with a focus on political economy topics. Through a comparative lens, we will examine how political systems, economic policies, and social institutions shape and influence each other across European countries and within the European Union.


Key themes include:


• Democratic Systems: What are the tradeoffs between representative and direct democracy? Is one approach inherently superior in fostering political and economic stability?


• Corruption: How can we effectively study and measure corruption, and what are its economic and political consequences?


• Social Policies and Welfare States: Why do some European countries offer more generous protections against risks like sickness, unemployment, and old age? What trade-offs do expansive social safety nets entail for economic growth and fiscal sustainability?


• European Union Politics: Under what conditions do member states choose to delegate authority to the EU or reclaim powers at the national level?


The module also examines the EU’s capacity to manage crises, analysing its responses to challenges such as the euro crisis, trade disputes, the COVID-19 pandemic, and other disruptions. Why has the EU succeeded in some instances and failed in others? Finally, this module provides an accessible introduction to the research design and methods political scientists use to investigate these questions. You will gain practical tools for studying political economy topics in a rigorous and systematic way.

Module aims

The aims of this module are:



  • To enable students to develop their thinking with a sound knowledge of contemporary European politics and to write clearly and logically about the advantages and limitations of comparative research.

  • To provide students with the opportunity to understand the linkages between empirical facts and abstract concepts.

  • To enable students to retrieve, synthesise and critically evaluate information from diverse sources.

  • To provide an overview of writing effectively for different audience.

  • To provide students with the opportunity to revise written work based on feedback.

Module learning outcomes

By the end of this module, students will be expected to be able to:



  1. Demonstrate a sound knowledge of contemporary European politics, and understand the advantages and limitations of comparative research. Specifically, participants will become familiar with important academic debates in democratic theory, corruption, European Union politics, and social & economic policymaking in Europe.

  2. Critically assess the validity of conflicting theoretical claims and arguments on the basis of appropriate empirical evidence.

  3. Demonstrate their analytical and writing skills, by composing short response papers, an essay, and peer review comments, and tailoring their writing to different audiences.

Module information

Syllabus



  • Week 16: Direct Democracy and Referendums

  • Week 17: Corruption in Europe

  • Week 18: Varieties of Capitalism and Skill Regimes

  • Week 19: The Welfare State and Welfare State Retrenchment 

  • Week 20: Central Banks

  • Week 21: The European Union – politics and crisis management

  • Week 22: Disintegration Dynamics in the EU

  • Week 23: EU Trade Policy

  • Week 24: TBA

  • Week 25: Presentations of student draft papers & peer review

Learning and teaching methods

The module will be delivered via:

  • 2 hour seminar, in person (on campus)

Bibliography*

  • SETALA, M. (2006) 'On the problems of responsibility and accountability in referendums', European Journal of Political Research, 45(4), pp. 699–721. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00630.x.
  • Gherghina, S. (2017) 'Direct democracy and subjective regime legitimacy in Europe', Democratization, 24(4), pp. 613–631. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1196355.
  • de Vreese, C.H. (2006) 'Political Parties in Dire Straits?', Party Politics, 12(5), pp. 581–598. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068806066787.
  • Hobolt, S.B. (2006) 'Direct democracy and European integration', Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), pp. 153–166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500380825.
  • Fernandez-Vazquez, P., Barbera, P., and Rivero, G. (2016) 'Rooting out corruption, or voting for corruption? The heterogeneous electoral consequences of scandals', Rooting out corruption, or voting for corruption? The heterogeneous electoral consequences of scandals, 4(2), pp. 379–397.
  • Pappas, T. S. (2009) 'Patrons against Partisans: the Politics of Patronage in Mass Ideological Parties', Patrons against Partisans: the Politics of Patronage in Mass Ideological Parties, 15(3), pp. 315–334.
  • Larcinese, V. and Sircar, I. (2017) 'Crime and punishment the British way: Accountability channels following the MPs' expenses scandal', Crime and punishment the British way: Accountability channels following the MPs' expenses scandal, 47, pp. 75–99.
  • Fazekas, M. and et al (2013) 'Are EU funds a corruption risk? The impact of EU funds on grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe'. Budapest.
  • Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001) 'Varieties of Capitalism. Introduction (on Moodle)', in Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247757.001.0001.
  • Estevez-Abe, Margarita (2006) 'Gendering the Varieties of Capitalism. A Study of Occupational Segregation by Sex in Advanced Industrial Societies', World Politics, 59(1), pp. 142–176. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/wpot59&i=158.
  • Jackson, Gregory and Deeg, Richard (2006) 'How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity'. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/19930.
  • Thelen, K. and Busemeyer, M.R. (2011) 'Institutional Change in German Vocational Training: From Collectivism toward Segmentalism', in M.R. Busemeyer and C. Trampusch (eds) The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation. Oxford University Press, pp. 68–100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599431.003.0003.
  • Ross, F. (2000) '“Beyond Left and Right”: The New Partisan Politics of Welfare', Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(2), pp. 155–183. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00127.
  • GIGER, N. and NELSON, M. (2011) 'The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity?', European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), pp. 1–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01922.x.
  • Beland, D. (2005) 'Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective', Social Policy and Administration, 39(1), pp. 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00421.x.
  • Häusermann, S. (2006) 'Changing coalitions in social policy reforms: the politics of new social needs and demands', Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), pp. 5–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706059827.
  • Peter A. Hall (1994) 'Central Bank Independence and Coordinated Wage Bargaining: Their Interaction in Germany and Europe', German Politics & Society, (31), pp. 1–23. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23736282?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
  • J. Lawrence Broz (1998) 'The Origins of Central Banking: Solutions to the Free-Rider Problem', International Organization, 52(2), pp. 231–268. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2601275?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
  • Louis W. Pauly (1995) 'Capital Mobility, State Autonomy and Political Legitimacy', Journal of International Affairs, 48(2), pp. 369–388. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357596?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
  • Feldstein, Martin (2012) 'The Failure of the Euro: The Little Currency That Couldn't', Foreign Affairs, 91(1), pp. 105–1162012. Available at: https://search-ebscohost-com.uniessexlib.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=69880011&site=ehost-live&authtype=sso&custid=s9814295.
  • Genschel, P. and Jachtenfuchs, M. (2018) 'From Market Integration to Core State Powers: The Eurozone Crisis, the Refugee Crisis and Integration Theory', JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), pp. 178–196. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12654.
  • Hennessy, A. (2013) 'Informal Governance and the Eurozone Crisis', Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 21(3), pp. 429–446. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2013.831605.
  • Niemann, A. and Zaun, N. (2018) 'EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives', JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), pp. 3–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12650.
  • Harteveld, E. et al. (2018) 'Blaming Brussels? The Impact of (News about) the Refugee Crisis on Attitudes towards the EU and National Politics', JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), pp. 157–177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12664.
  • Peter Mair (2007) 'Political Opposition and the European Union', Government and Opposition, 42(1), pp. 1–17. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44483177.
  • Walter, Stefanie et al. (2018) 'Noncooperation by Popular Vote: Expectations, Foreign Intervention, and the Vote in the 2015 Greek Bailout Referendum', International Organization, 72(4). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26569503.
  • Gravey, V. and Jordan, A. (2016) 'Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity', Journal of European Public Policy, 23(8), pp. 1180–1198. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1186208.
  • Jones, Erik, Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Meunier, Sophie (2016) 'Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration', Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), pp. 1010–1034. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/compls49&i=987.
  • Jones, E. (2018) 'Towards a theory of disintegration', Journal of European Public Policy, 25(3), pp. 440–451. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1411381.
  • Meunier, S. and Nicolaïdis, K. (2006) 'The European Union as a conflicted trade power', Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), pp. 906–925. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600838623.
  • Meissner, K.L. and McKenzie, L. (2019) 'The paradox of human rights conditionality in EU trade policy: when strategic interests drive policy outcomes', Journal of European Public Policy, 26(9), pp. 1273–1291. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1526203.
  • Baccini, L. and Dür, A. (2012) 'The New Regionalism and Policy Interdependence', British Journal of Political Science, 42(1), pp. 57–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000238.
The above list is indicative of the essential reading for the course.
The library makes provision for all reading list items, with digital provision where possible, and these resources are shared between students.
Further reading can be obtained from this module's reading list.

Assessment items, weightings and deadlines

Coursework / exam Description Deadline Coursework weighting
Coursework   Short response paper 1    20% 
Coursework   Short response paper 2    20% 
Coursework   Essay, first draft    0% 
Coursework   Peer-review    0% 
Coursework   Revised essay and response to reviewer    60% 

Exam format definitions

  • Remote, open book: Your exam will take place remotely via an online learning platform. You may refer to any physical or electronic materials during the exam.
  • In-person, open book: Your exam will take place on campus under invigilation. You may refer to any physical materials such as paper study notes or a textbook during the exam. Electronic devices may not be used in the exam.
  • In-person, open book (restricted): The exam will take place on campus under invigilation. You may refer only to specific physical materials such as a named textbook during the exam. Permitted materials will be specified by your department. Electronic devices may not be used in the exam.
  • In-person, closed book: The exam will take place on campus under invigilation. You may not refer to any physical materials or electronic devices during the exam. There may be times when a paper dictionary, for example, may be permitted in an otherwise closed book exam. Any exceptions will be specified by your department.

Your department will provide further guidance before your exams.

Overall assessment

Coursework Exam
100% 0%

Reassessment

Coursework Exam
100% 0%
Module supervisor and teaching staff
Dr Alexandra Hennessy, email: alexandra.hennessy@essex.ac.uk.
Dr Alexandra Hennessy
Please contact govpgquery@essex.ac.uk

 

Availability
No
No
No

External examiner

Dr Kyriaki Nanou
Durham University
Associate Professor in European politics
Resources
Available via Moodle
No lecture recording information available for this module.

 

Further information
Government

* Please note: due to differing publication schedules, items marked with an asterisk (*) base their information upon the previous academic year.

Disclaimer: The University makes every effort to ensure that this information on its Module Directory is accurate and up-to-date. Exceptionally it can be necessary to make changes, for example to programmes, modules, facilities or fees. Examples of such reasons might include a change of law or regulatory requirements, industrial action, lack of demand, departure of key personnel, change in government policy, or withdrawal/reduction of funding. Changes to modules may for example consist of variations to the content and method of delivery or assessment of modules and other services, to discontinue modules and other services and to merge or combine modules. The University will endeavour to keep such changes to a minimum, and will also keep students informed appropriately by updating our programme specifications and module directory.

The full Procedures, Rules and Regulations of the University governing how it operates are set out in the Charter, Statutes and Ordinances and in the University Regulations, Policy and Procedures.